Date SUBMITTED: Ocotober 9, 2006
DATE
OF WORKSHOP SESSION: october 11, 2006
date
of public MEETING: N/A
To: MAYOR & Board of ALDERMEN
From: Chuck
Boyd, Deputy Director for Planning
RE: Adequate
Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO)
PURPOSE: This is a continuation of the
discussion of the APFO. At this
workshop, staff will discussion some policy issues that need to be resolved in
creating the text for the ordinance.
HISTORY: This workshop is a follow up to the 7/19/06, 8/2/06, 8/9/06, 8/23/06, 8/30/06 and 9/20/06 workshops. These workshops were intended to provide the Mayor & Board of Aldermen background information about two different APFO models. Listed below is a summation of the previous workshops:
At the 7/19/06 workshop, staff presented basic information on what is an APFO, the facilities that can be associated with an APFO and the City’s history with the APFO.
At the 8/2/06 workshop, Mayor Jones & Rick Stup
presented information concerning
At the 8/9/06 workshop, Jeff Bronow presented information on
At the 8/23/06 workshop, staff presented the Mayor & Board of the components of an allocation system including: sub regions, special allocations and development projections.
At the 8/30/06 workshop, Ray Barnes from the FCPS presented
information on CIP process, School
Construction Process and State Rate Capacity.
At the 9/20/06
workshop, staff presented information on how an allocation system could
work. Staff presented a detail
explanation of how a 600 unit allocation would be distributed over a 4 year
period.
At the 9/20/06 workshop, county staff presented information on how road component of the APFO works in County.
Staff believes that
an allocation process would work well for the City of
DISCUSSION:
Issues that will
need to be addressed by the Mayor & Board of Aldermen:
Allocation
Component
Exemption to APFO test due to size of development (5 residential lots of less)?
Is the purpose of
the allocation component of the APFO to allocate all units approved by the
Mayor & Board? Or, if one area of
the City is shut down does those units get reallocated to other areas that can
handle growth?
Schools
Do we allow for a buyout?
If a CIP project is two years out, does that get counted towards capacity?
Sunset provision for schools?
Testing for each level of school (E, M & HS)?
Does each test need to be only passed once?
Roads
Do we allow for a buyout?
If a CIP project is two years out, does that get counted towards capacity?
Impact fees
The following
information is provided so that the Mayor & Board can review what will be
presented in the annual report. This
information will be critical to determine the allocation and resolution for the
following year.
Annual Report to include:
Available water to allocate
Sewer Capacity for all basins
Pipeline
Residential
Non Residential
History
Allocation
Permits
Allocated units on hold and at what stage
CIP projects
Schools – schools that are closed
Roads impact fees
Projects added
Projects deleted
Revised amount
Yearly resolution to include:
Amount of water available
Broken down in EDU
Water available for non residential
% of water to be allocated to
Residential
Non Residential
Special Allocation
Revised road impact fee
RECOMMENDATION: Staff has no recommendations at this time.
BACKUP INCLUDED: None
REVIEWED BY DEPARTMENT HEAD: Charles W. Boyd
CONCURRENCE BY:
Date Date
FINANCE ________ _______ LEGAL ________
________
CITIZEN SERVICES ________ _______ FPD ________ ________
DEPT. PUBLIC
WORKS ________ _______
PLANNING ________ ________
ENGINEERING
________ _______ CIP ________ ________